3500-Interviewing Techniques
Auditing
requires interpersonal contact and, therefore, the ability to effectively
communicate with people. Communication occurs most frequently through the audit
interview, which is primarily used to obtain information about operating
procedures. As the major source of contact, the interview also presents the
opportunity to create and maintain better relations between the audit
department and auditees. Effective interviewing helps the auditee come to
regard the auditor as an aid to improvement, rather than bearer of trouble.
Before the
interview can begin, the auditor must determine and clarify his objectives:
"What information is needed?" or "What is to be accomplished as
a result of the interview?" The objectives are the purpose for conducting
the interview and should not be forgotten as it progresses. Once the objectives
are determined, the auditor can determine the best method for accomplishing
them.
Fundamentally,
two methods of interviewing are recognized--directive and non-directive. The
directive interview is planned and led by the auditor whose purpose is to
obtain specific information about verifiable facts. Prior to the interview, the
auditor determines exactly what they want to know and establishes questions
that will aid them in arriving at the information. During the interview, the
auditor maintains complete control of events. They set the tone and the pace
and keep the conversation in line with the predetermined program. The advantage
in directive interviewing is that the auditor discovers exactly what they want
to know. The disadvantage is that they discover very little else.
In
contrast to the rigid control of the directive interview, the non-directive
interview is to achieve understanding and build confidence with the auditee by
creating an atmosphere of candid self-expression. When using this technique,
the auditor avoids asking direct questions. The interview is structured only to
the extent that the auditor opens areas for discussion. While the free form of
the non-directive interview has the advantage of presenting new areas for
investigation, the discussion can wander indefinitely if it is not well
controlled.
The
interviewing method chosen depends on the situations presented to the auditor.
The person being interviewed, the information needed and the time allotted must
all be considered before the method can be determined. Consequently, there is
not a universal "best" method for conducting an interview. Directive
may be used one time, non-directive the next, and a combination of the two on a
subsequent occasion. Generally, within the audit framework, the interview
begins with the directive approach and concludes with the non-directive
approach so that a maximum amount of information can be gained within the
limited time available.
After the
method has been determined, there are several steps that should be followed in
conducting the interview. They are as follows:
Plan
The Interview
Planning
for the interview should include scheduling the interview, establishing where
the interview will take place and determining who will be involved and in what
sequence.
In
scheduling the interview, the department's peak workloads should be considered.
The auditor should have enough knowledge of the department's operations so that
they will avoid peak work periods. A time and place mutually convenient to the
auditor and to the auditee should be established.
The
setting for the interview should reflect an atmosphere conducive to congenial
conversation. If possible, a place that is comfortable and completely private
should be found. The auditee will talk more freely if the possibility of being
overheard is eliminated. Furthermore, constant interruptions divert the
conversation and important objectives may not be achieved.
The
auditor must also decide who should be interviewed and in what sequence the
interviews should occur. The manager of the department being reviewed will
invariably be interviewed. In addition, supervisors and appropriate operating
personnel should be interviewed since they are more often aware of how the
department is functioning and where problem areas lie.
Open
The Interview
Establishing
rapport is the purpose of a good opening. The opening should be kept informal
with a few general remarks that will put the auditee at ease, especially if the
auditee seems apprehensive. If, however, the auditee appears to be pressed for
time, small talk will probably irritate them and should, therefore, be avoided.
Conduct the opening according to the mood of the auditee, but always be
informal, friendly and natural.
Question
Regardless
of the method of interviewing used, all questions that are asked should be
designed to elicit a detailed response. Avoid questions that can be answered
with a "yes" or "no." Rather than using "do" or
"are" to begin a question, use "why," "how" and
"what" or other words that requires an explanation in reply. Also,
avoid leading questions that assume an answer. The leading question usually
evokes the response the auditor wants to hear instead of an accurate reply.
(Although they can be one and the same, it's better not to make this
assumption.) If, for example, the auditor asks, "You do keep all signature
cards on file, don't you," the auditee will be inclined to answer
"yes" even if they do not have a single card in their file drawers.
Listen
Listening,
as opposed to hearing, should begin the moment the interview begins and
continue throughout. Listening and hearing are not the same. Whereas hearing is
only the mechanical reception of sound, listening is a skill requiring
discipline as seen in the ability to give attention, to interpret and to
understand. In short, listening is the facility for determining the speaker's
meaning.
Meaning
can be discerned from more than words alone. It can be inferred from voice
inflections, rate of speech, gestures, facial expressions, body language or the
emotional tone of the words spoken. The manner in which something is said can
be more revealing than what is said. Very often, the speaker's sincerity,
emotions, attitudes or intentions can be detected from the clues contained in
the way the words are spoken.
Close
the Interview
The
auditor should know when to terminate the interview. If the auditee appears to
be restless or preoccupied, end the interview as quickly as possible. If, on
the other hand, they are especially talkative and willing to continue the
conversation, do not stop because the allotted time is up. Valuable information
could be lost as a result of sticking to a schedule.
In closing
the interview, follow simple rules of courtesy and common sense. Always express
appreciation for the opportunity to talk with the auditee and offer to answer
any questions that may arise regarding the interview itself or the audit in
general.
Follow
Through on the Interview
If during
the interview it was decided that some kind of action should be taken, take it.
If another interview is to be set up, set it up. When, however, unforeseen
circumstances prevent a decision from being acted upon, inform the auditee and
explain why. The failure to support words with actions is the fastest route to
losing credibility and should be avoided without exception.
Review
and Evaluate
In order
to learn for future interviewing, review and evaluate notes made during and after
the interview. Go back over the interview to determine what went right or wrong
and why. Interviewing techniques can then be adjusted and practiced according
to past successes and failures.
Interviewing
is a skill and as such, requires practice in order to be done effectively. The
steps outlined above should serve as practice guidelines and not as an
inflexible set of rules. After experience has been attained, revisions,
deletions or additions can be made. Eventually, the auditor will have developed
a style of interviewing that is comfortable and is an effective device for
acquiring information as well as communicating with auditees.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to Office
of Internal Audit Main Page